`color{blue} ✍️` A capacitor, as we have seen above, is a system of two conductors with charge `Q` and `–Q. `
`color{blue} ✍️` To determine the energy stored in this configuration, consider initially two uncharged conductors `1` and `2`. Imagine next a process of transferring charge from conductor `2` to conductor 1 bit by bit, so that at the end, conductor `1` gets charge `Q`.
`color{blue} ✍️` By charge conservation, conductor `2` has charge `–Q` at the end (Fig 2.30 ).
`color{blue} ✍️` In transferring positive charge from conductor `2` to conductor `1`, work will be done externally, since at any stage conductor `1` is at a higher potential than conductor `2`.
`color{blue} ✍️` To calculate the total work done, we first calculate the work done in a small step involving transfer of an infinitesimal (i.e., vanishingly small) amount of charge. Consider the intermediate situation when the conductors 1 and 2 have charges Q′ and –Q′ respectively.
`color{blue} ✍️` At this stage, the potential difference `V′` between conductors `1` to 2 is `Q′//C,` where `C` is the capacitance of the system. Next imagine that a small charge `δ Q′` is transferred from conductor `2` to `1`. Work done in this step `(δ W′ )`, resulting in charge Q′ on conductor 1 increasing to `color{purple}(Q′+ δ Q′)`, is given by
`color{purple}(δW = V′δQ' = (Q')/C δQ')` ....................... 2.68
`color{blue} ✍️` Since `δ Q′` can be made as small as we like, Eq. (2.68) can be written as
`color{purple}(δW = 1/(2C) [(Q' + δQ')^2-Q'^2])` ..................2.69
`color{blue} ✍️` Equations (2.68) and (2.69) are identical because the term of second order in δ Q′, i.e., `δ Q′ 2//2C`, is negligible, since `δ Q′` is arbitrarily small. The total work done (W) is the sum of the small work `(δ W)` over the very large number of steps involved in building the charge Q′ from zero to Q.
`color{purple}(W= underset("sum over all steps")sum ( deltaW)`
`color{purple}(W = underset("sum over all steps")sum 1/(2C) [(Q' δQ')^2-Q'^2])` ................... 2.70
`color{purple}(= 1/(2C) [(deltaQ'^2 -o')+{(2deltaQ')^2 - deltaQ'^2} + {(3deltaQ'^2)-(2deltaQ')^2}+.....+{Q^2-(Q_deltaQ)^2})` ......2.71
`color{purple}(= 1/(2C) {Q^2-0] = (Q^2)/(2C))` ...................2.72
The same result can be obtained directly from Eq. (2.68) by integration
`color{green}(W = int_(0)^(Q) 1/CdeltaQ' = 1/C (Q'^2)/2 |_(0)^(Q) = (Q^2)/(2C))`
`color{blue} ✍️` This is not surprising since integration is nothing but summation of a large number of small terms.
We can write the final result, Eq. (2.72) in different ways
`color{purple}(W = (Q^2)/(2C) = 1/2 CV^2 = 1/2 QV)` ......................2.73
`color{blue} ✍️` Since electrostatic force is conservative, this work is stored in the form of potential energy of the system.
`color{blue} ✍️` For the same reason, the final result for potential energy [Eq. (2.73)] is independent of the manner in which the charge configuration of the capacitor is built up.
`color{blue} ✍️` When the capacitor discharges, this stored-up energy is released. It is possible to view the potential energy of the capacitor as ‘stored’ in the electric field between the plates. To see this, consider for simplicity, a parallel plate capacitor [of area A(of each plate) and separation d between the plates]. Energy stored in the capacitor
`color{purple}(1/2 (Q^2)/C = (Asigma)^2/2 xx d/(epsilon_0A))` ........................ 2.74
`\color{green} ✍️` The surface charge density `σ` is related to the electric field `E` between the plates,
`color{purple}(E= (sigma)/(epsilon_0))` .................2.74
From Eqs. (2.74) and (2.75) , we get Energy stored in the capacitor
`color{purple}(U = (1/2)ε_0 E^2 × Ad)` .......................2.76
`color{blue} ✍️` Note that Ad is the volume of the region between the plates (where electric field alone exists). If we define energy density as energy stored per unit volume of space, Eq (2.76) shows that Energy density of electric field,
`color{purple}(u =(1/2)ε_0E^2)` ..........................2.77
`color{blue} ✍️` Though we derived Eq. (2.77) for the case of a parallel plate capacitor, the result on energy density of an electric field is, in fact, very general and holds true for electric field due to any configuration of charges.
`color{blue} ✍️` A capacitor, as we have seen above, is a system of two conductors with charge `Q` and `–Q. `
`color{blue} ✍️` To determine the energy stored in this configuration, consider initially two uncharged conductors `1` and `2`. Imagine next a process of transferring charge from conductor `2` to conductor 1 bit by bit, so that at the end, conductor `1` gets charge `Q`.
`color{blue} ✍️` By charge conservation, conductor `2` has charge `–Q` at the end (Fig 2.30 ).
`color{blue} ✍️` In transferring positive charge from conductor `2` to conductor `1`, work will be done externally, since at any stage conductor `1` is at a higher potential than conductor `2`.
`color{blue} ✍️` To calculate the total work done, we first calculate the work done in a small step involving transfer of an infinitesimal (i.e., vanishingly small) amount of charge. Consider the intermediate situation when the conductors 1 and 2 have charges Q′ and –Q′ respectively.
`color{blue} ✍️` At this stage, the potential difference `V′` between conductors `1` to 2 is `Q′//C,` where `C` is the capacitance of the system. Next imagine that a small charge `δ Q′` is transferred from conductor `2` to `1`. Work done in this step `(δ W′ )`, resulting in charge Q′ on conductor 1 increasing to `color{purple}(Q′+ δ Q′)`, is given by
`color{purple}(δW = V′δQ' = (Q')/C δQ')` ....................... 2.68
`color{blue} ✍️` Since `δ Q′` can be made as small as we like, Eq. (2.68) can be written as
`color{purple}(δW = 1/(2C) [(Q' + δQ')^2-Q'^2])` ..................2.69
`color{blue} ✍️` Equations (2.68) and (2.69) are identical because the term of second order in δ Q′, i.e., `δ Q′ 2//2C`, is negligible, since `δ Q′` is arbitrarily small. The total work done (W) is the sum of the small work `(δ W)` over the very large number of steps involved in building the charge Q′ from zero to Q.
`color{purple}(W= underset("sum over all steps")sum ( deltaW)`
`color{purple}(W = underset("sum over all steps")sum 1/(2C) [(Q' δQ')^2-Q'^2])` ................... 2.70
`color{purple}(= 1/(2C) [(deltaQ'^2 -o')+{(2deltaQ')^2 - deltaQ'^2} + {(3deltaQ'^2)-(2deltaQ')^2}+.....+{Q^2-(Q_deltaQ)^2})` ......2.71
`color{purple}(= 1/(2C) {Q^2-0] = (Q^2)/(2C))` ...................2.72
The same result can be obtained directly from Eq. (2.68) by integration
`color{green}(W = int_(0)^(Q) 1/CdeltaQ' = 1/C (Q'^2)/2 |_(0)^(Q) = (Q^2)/(2C))`
`color{blue} ✍️` This is not surprising since integration is nothing but summation of a large number of small terms.
We can write the final result, Eq. (2.72) in different ways
`color{purple}(W = (Q^2)/(2C) = 1/2 CV^2 = 1/2 QV)` ......................2.73
`color{blue} ✍️` Since electrostatic force is conservative, this work is stored in the form of potential energy of the system.
`color{blue} ✍️` For the same reason, the final result for potential energy [Eq. (2.73)] is independent of the manner in which the charge configuration of the capacitor is built up.
`color{blue} ✍️` When the capacitor discharges, this stored-up energy is released. It is possible to view the potential energy of the capacitor as ‘stored’ in the electric field between the plates. To see this, consider for simplicity, a parallel plate capacitor [of area A(of each plate) and separation d between the plates]. Energy stored in the capacitor
`color{purple}(1/2 (Q^2)/C = (Asigma)^2/2 xx d/(epsilon_0A))` ........................ 2.74
`\color{green} ✍️` The surface charge density `σ` is related to the electric field `E` between the plates,
`color{purple}(E= (sigma)/(epsilon_0))` .................2.74
From Eqs. (2.74) and (2.75) , we get Energy stored in the capacitor
`color{purple}(U = (1/2)ε_0 E^2 × Ad)` .......................2.76
`color{blue} ✍️` Note that Ad is the volume of the region between the plates (where electric field alone exists). If we define energy density as energy stored per unit volume of space, Eq (2.76) shows that Energy density of electric field,
`color{purple}(u =(1/2)ε_0E^2)` ..........................2.77
`color{blue} ✍️` Though we derived Eq. (2.77) for the case of a parallel plate capacitor, the result on energy density of an electric field is, in fact, very general and holds true for electric field due to any configuration of charges.